Let’s start with the positives. First off all Branson has created yet more headlines for Virgin which we know he is great at doing. He has even started a UK wide national discussion on the subject so people are talking about him and Virgin. More innovation and daring from Virgin it seems…
However
peer behind the headlines and you’ll see a more considered move. First off all,
Branson knows a thing or two about human psychology. He’s banking that his
personal team of 170 are by and large working with him because they want to. It’s a fair assumption
that Branson already gives his people the core requirements of what research
tells us motivates people at work. Dan Pink did a good job of summing it up as ‘autonomy, mastery and purpose’. Branson’s team are also more than likely to be competitively
remunerated for their efforts too – however do not let this confuse the point.
Money by and large is a poor day to day motivator. My supposition is that
Branson knows that money is only really a problem if it is perceived as not being
enough. Therefore I expect that he ensures his team are well ‘rewarded’ in
this traditional sense of the word. Furthermore and arguably more importantly, I
suspect that he and his senior leadership team are good at actually telling
people they’re valued.
All
of the fore mentioned factors allow him to bank on what he knows to work and
that is ‘trusting people’. He knows he has the right people in place and by
trusting them to make adult choices about holidays he is cutting back on bureaucracy
and kicking an industrial era practice out of the 21st century…
Ok
so that’s the positive view on all of this. Now for the negatives. If there
were to be a downside of scrapping holidays, it will not be because people take
liberties. In fact the problem could ironically be the exact opposite of the
apparent benefit, in that people will not take enough holidays! Virgin is a
successful company; it hasn’t got that way by accident but through hard work. I
suspect many of Branson’s team will have migrated to him from other corporates.
In my experience the underlying and unwritten rule is the same – long hours is
the name of the game.
The
risk for Virgin is that people take less holidays either because they forget
to manage them or because they feel pressure that the best way to get on is not
to take them. This could result in a dissatisfied and burned out workforce.
However
I’m going to have faith that this will not happen and this is because of the
man himself. Any initiative of this sort is hugely dependent on leaders walking
the walk. I’ll go back to my earlier point and that is Branson simply
understands human psychology and basic leadership principles. Indeed he has applied them throughout his career. As a
happy coincidence he also seems to be a man who enjoys leisure as much as work.
If
I were offering advice to Virgin it would be to make sure they monitor the
situation to ensure that people do in fact take holidays. At any rate it
will be really interesting to find out how this works out. From a purely human psychology perspective, I think Branson is on the money with this one.
Would
scrapping holidays work in your company? It really comes down to the beliefs
and values of the organisation. The reality is that for many organisations it would be a step too far because the conditions for it to work, which can be summed up as 'trust', do not exist.
What do you think?
No comments:
Post a Comment